Hi Ben, That's a really good idea ! However relinking all the packages can take some times (hey there are still 3 packages linked with openssl 0.9.7), maybe it might be more efficient to focus first on the ones that really cause some problems.
Until now, I only know about libneon (which explicitely checks for ssl version mismatch): https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4947 I suppose we should look first for every package linked with openssl which depend on a library also linked with openssl. Can we easily extract that information from the database ? Yann 2012/6/7 Ben Walton <[email protected]> > > Hi All, > > If you're maintaining a package the links with openssl and you haven't > re-rolled your package to use the newly released 1.0.0, I'd like to > solicit a few of your cycles to do so. > > We currently have a situation where many programs will end up pulling > in both library versions (0.9.8 and 1.0.0) at runtime causing some of > them to explode. > > I was thinking that we could organize a somewhat informal hack-a-thon > and do a G+ hangout while we batch update lots of these packages. > It's getting into vacation time so this might be hard to organize, but > is there interest? > > Thanks > -Ben > -- > Ben Walton > Systems Programmer - CHASS > University of Toronto > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
