2012/6/7 <[email protected]> > > > I suppose we should look first for every package linked with openssl > which > > depend on a library also linked with openssl. > > Can we easily extract that information from the database ? > > I set up a wiki page to track progress with basic information. We can > enhance that while the project makes progress: > http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-openssl
Nice, I updated the page to highlight packages which are more likely to have problems. These are reverse dependancies of libcurl4 as it the only package I detected which currently causes some dual linking at runtime. However, we shouldn't blindly recompile libraries linked with ssl. We have to check first if their reverse dependancies are linked with openssl and in that case, we have to do a coordinated upload. BTW, does someone know under what conditions the dual linked binaries will not work ? Yann > > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
