On 03/09/13 14:45, slowfranklin wrote:
Well, we'll also need versioned libraries like CSWsamba4-libwclient0,
CSWsamba4-libsmbclient0.
For that specific library, actually, it should not be needed, bad
example ;-)
Okay, I see what you mean, but I don't see it as a problem: mgar, pkgchk
and friends make it all too easy to handle.
Well, since others (Debian, Fedora, ArchLinux) were all going for an
inplace upgrade, I considered that the obvious choice for an unstable
rolling catalog.
At least for Debian, that's not the case: they're planning on phasing
out Samba 3, but it's not close at all. They only do it in experimental
at this point. And for having worked with the Debian Samba maintainer, I
can assure you the switch is being spread over years, I would say maybe
even a decade, with both packages being available together in various
forms during this time (experimental, backports, then .
But we now have two votes for using the 4 suffix, so be it. :)
In any case, there's nothing set in stone for 4 at this point, since
it's not usable yet, so it looks like a safe point to start :-)
Laurent
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
