On 03/09/13 16:04, slowfranklin wrote:
No? Why not?! Otherwise we'd have the same package (eg CSWlibwbclient0) built from two different recipes uploaded to the catalog. Am I missing sth?
Since from what we discussed, it's just the same lib being built as part of either v3 or v4, one of the two would be dropped without problem. It's not like the tools which do conflict. It's only a matter of selecting which to keep (probably something like v3 while v4 is settling down, then v4 when it's mature).
Hold on. I was not referring to what Debian as a whole achieves by using different catalogs/distributions or backports. I said "obvious choice for an unstable rolling catalog" which would be unstable/sid in the Debian case. And apparently Debian is going to use an unversioned Samba 4 package in sid.
Right now they have some unversioned and versioned package, both from v4 in experimental, and from v3 and v4 respectively in unstable. Maybe it will go unversioned at some point, but they're apparently far from it.
For perspective, their stable/testing/unstable contain 4.0.0beta2 and experimental is 4.0.8. So it's not what we're discussing here either. We're planning for 4.1! They won't use that for *years*.
Laurent _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
