make-w32  

Messages by Date

• 2005/04/29 Re: w32 unistd.h Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/29 Re: w32 unistd.h Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/29 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/29 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/29 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/29 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/29 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 Re: w32 unistd.h Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/28 Sources build file for buildning GNU make with Windows DDK Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/28 w32 unistd.h (was Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/28 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/28 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/27 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/27 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/27 RE: Results of running tests with GNU make 3.81beta2 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 RE: Results of running tests with GNU make 3.81beta2 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/27 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/27 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/26 RE: Results of running tests with GNU make 3.81beta2 Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/26 Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/26 Re: Results of running tests with GNU make 3.81beta2 Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/26 Results of running tests with GNU make 3.81beta2 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/26 RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/26 Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/26 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/26 Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/25 RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/25 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/24 Re: FW: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/24 FW: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/24 RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/24 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/23 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/23 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/22 MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/22 Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/22 Re: Batch building and make -j Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/22 Can't download make.zip Windows version Rianto Mulia
• 2005/04/22 RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• 2005/04/22 Re: have troubles with make compiling Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/22 Re: have troubles with make compiling Johan Bezem
• 2005/04/22 have troubles with make compiling Íèê
• 2005/04/22 Re: Can't download make.zip Windows version J. Grant
• 2005/04/22 Batch building and make -j Casper Hornstrup
• 2005/04/05 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/05 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/04/05 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/04/05 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Carsten Fuchs
• 2005/04/04 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/04 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/04/04 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/04/03 Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Earnie Boyd
• 2005/04/03 Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? [email protected]
• 2005/03/31 Re: wrong link command called Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/30 RE: wrong link command called Ian Dunbar
• 2005/03/30 RE: wrong link command called Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/30 RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/30 Re: wrong link command called Johan Bezem
• 2005/03/29 Re: wrong link command called Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/29 RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/29 RE: wrong link command called Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/29 RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/29 Re: wrong link command called Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/29 RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/29 Re: wrong link command called Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/28 wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/28 Re: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Ken Smith
• 2005/03/26 RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
• 2005/03/26 RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
• 2005/03/26 RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/26 RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/26 RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
• 2005/03/26 Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/25 Re: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/25 Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
• 2005/03/25 Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures J. Grant
• 2005/03/19 Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/18 RE: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Klett, Michael
• 2005/03/17 Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/16 Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/16 Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/16 RE: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Harvey Werner
• 2005/03/16 DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Klett, Michael
• 2005/03/15 Re: So where are we? J. Grant
• 2005/03/11 Re: exporting SHELL in dos/windows Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/11 Re: exporting SHELL in dos/windows Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/11 exporting SHELL in dos/windows psmith
• 2005/03/11 Re: So where are we? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/10 Re: So where are we? J. Grant
• 2005/03/10 So where are we? Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 Re: CVS Make Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/10 signame.c bug Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 make check Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 Re: GNU Make for Microsoft DOS and Windows platforms Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/10 Re: CVS Make Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/10 CVS Make Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/10 GNU Make for Microsoft DOS and Windows platforms Neo Anderson
• 2005/03/10 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/10 Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript fordetails] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/09 Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/09 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] J. Grant
• 2005/03/09 Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/09 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/09 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/08 Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/08 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/08 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/08 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/07 Re: win32 'Path' Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 Re: win32 'Path' Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/07 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/07 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 Re: win32 "Path" Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 Re: win32 'Path' Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/07 win32 "Path" J. Grant
• 2005/03/07 Re: win32 'Path' Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/06 Re: win32 "Path" Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/06 Re: win32 "Path" David Baird
• 2005/03/06 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/06 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/06 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/06 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/06 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/06 win32 "Path" J. Grant
• 2005/03/05 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/05 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/04 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
• 2005/03/04 Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/04 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/03 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/03 Re: GNU make for cygwin performance Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/03 GNU make for cygwin performance Jonathan Baccash
• 2005/03/03 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/02 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/02 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/02 PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/02 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/02 Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/02 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/02 PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? John Calcote
• 2005/03/02 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/02 PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/02 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS J. Grant
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/01 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/03/01 Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/01 Windows-specific bug 11183 psmith
• 2005/03/01 Ctrl-C patch (Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
• 2005/03/01 Re: Ctrl-C patch (Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
• 2005/03/01 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
• 2005/02/28 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS J. Grant
• 2005/02/28 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/02/28 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/02/28 Re: Schedule for GNU make 3.81 Eli Zaretskii
• 2005/02/28 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS Paul D. Smith
• 2005/02/28 Re: make 3.81 MinGW port and testsuite working with MSYS J. Grant
• 2005/02/28 Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely

• Earlier messages
• Later messages