<quote who="Eli Zaretskii"> >> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:19:45 +0000 >> From: "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] >> >> For instance, the output from the MSYS port of make: >> >> $ make -fmissing.mak >> make: missing.mak: No such file or directory >> make: *** No rule to make target `missing.mak'. Stop. >> >> In my view the MinGW port should also have the same output, without any >> OS specific program executable file type suffix. > > Why, because MSYS did that? I'd say, let's ask MSYS people to leave > .exe as we do. >
Again, the MSYS version of make has no relevance to this issue. The MSYS version of make is similar to the Cygwin version of make and is emulating what UNIX would do. Cygwin and MSYS treat the command foo similar to a symlink to foo.exe. Earnie -- http://www.mingw.org http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438 _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
