> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:06:37 +0000
> From: "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected]
>
> (In my view I do not think we should not include .exe as part of the
> program output string. The other ports only display "make" or "gmake" etc.)
I'm not sure I understand: do you think we should keep the .exe or do
you think we should remove it?
As I already said, the DJGPP port was showing "make.exe" for years,
and it was never a problem. I don't think we should change it now, as
it could break something that relies on this, e.g. in sub-make's, or
the value of the $MAKE variable. I say, let's leave the .exe alone.
> if (program == 0)
> program = argv[0];
> else
> - ++program;
> + {
> + /* Increment past the initial '\', if there is another character
> after. */
> + if(program[0] == '/' || program[0] == '\\')
> + {
> + int str_len_p = strlen(program);
> + if(str_len_p > 1)
> + ++program;
> + }
> + }
Why did you need this snippet? The test for '/' or '\' was already
done above, so what case does this handle?
_______________________________________________
Make-w32 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
