make-w32  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • w32 unistd.h (was Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: w32 unistd.h Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: w32 unistd.h Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: w32 unistd.h Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Earnie Boyd
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Jerker Bäck
  • RE: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Bug report: Compile with Microsoft and Intel compiler Eli Zaretskii
• FW: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Jerker Bäck
  • Re: FW: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
• MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Jerker Bäck
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Paul D. Smith
  • RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues with make 3.80 Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
  • RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
  • RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
  • Re: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Alessandro Vesely
  • RE: MS compiler 7.1 (Visual Studio .NET 7.1 and DDK 2003) issues withmake 3.80 Jerker Bäck
• Can't download make.zip Windows version Rianto Mulia
  • Re: Can't download make.zip Windows version J. Grant
• have troubles with make compiling Íèê
  • Re: have troubles with make compiling Johan Bezem
  • Re: have troubles with make compiling Paul D. Smith
• Batch building and make -j Casper Hornstrup
  • Re: Batch building and make -j Paul D. Smith
• Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? [email protected]
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Jonathan Baccash
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Carsten Fuchs
  • Re: Portable makefiles - portable shell commands? Paul D. Smith
• wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
  • Re: wrong link command called Earnie Boyd
  • RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
  • Re: wrong link command called Eli Zaretskii
  • RE: wrong link command called Earnie Boyd
  • RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
  • RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
  • Re: wrong link command called Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: wrong link command called Johan Bezem
  • RE: wrong link command called Jonathan Baccash
  • RE: wrong link command called Paul D. Smith
  • Re: wrong link command called Alessandro Vesely
  • RE: wrong link command called Ian Dunbar
• Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
  • Re: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
  • RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
  • RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
  • RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
  • RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Paul D. Smith
  • RE: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Casper Hornstrup
  • Re: Dependencies on directories on NTFS volumes Ken Smith
• Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures J. Grant
  • Re: MinGW/MSYS testsuite results / failures Eli Zaretskii
• DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Klett, Michael
  • Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Paul D. Smith
  • Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Paul D. Smith
  • RE: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Harvey Werner
  • RE: DOS gnu Make automatic variable / implicit rule question Klett, Michael
• exporting SHELL in dos/windows psmith
  • Re: exporting SHELL in dos/windows Earnie Boyd
  • Re: exporting SHELL in dos/windows Eli Zaretskii
• So where are we? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: So where are we? J. Grant
  • Re: So where are we? J. Grant
  • Re: So where are we? Eli Zaretskii
• signame.c bug Earnie Boyd
• make check Earnie Boyd
• CVS Make Earnie Boyd
  • Re: CVS Make Paul D. Smith
  • Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
  • Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
  • Re: CVS Make Earnie Boyd
  • Re: CVS Make Paul D. Smith
• GNU Make for Microsoft DOS and Windows platforms Neo Anderson
  • Re: GNU Make for Microsoft DOS and Windows platforms Eli Zaretskii
• win32 "Path" J. Grant
  • Re: win32 "Path" David Baird
  • Re: win32 "Path" Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: win32 'Path' Earnie Boyd
  • Re: win32 'Path' Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: win32 'Path' Earnie Boyd
  • Re: win32 'Path' Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: win32 "Path" Alessandro Vesely
  • win32 "Path" J. Grant
• GNU make for cygwin performance Jonathan Baccash
  • Re: GNU make for cygwin performance Paul D. Smith
• PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Earnie Boyd
  • Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript fordetails] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] J. Grant
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] David Baird
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] Alessandro Vesely
• PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? John Calcote
  • Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
• Windows-specific bug 11183 psmith
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Windows-specific bug 11183 Paul D. Smith
• Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Barry Kelly
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: PATH vs. Path (was: Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Eli Zaretskii
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Earnie Boyd
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Ctrl-C patch (Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: Ctrl-C patch (Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Paul D. Smith
  • Re: Savannah W32 patches... are any OK? Alessandro Vesely

• Earlier messages
• Later messages