On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 09:50:48PM +0100, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> I think it should expand to
>
> LLIBPERL=-L$(PERL_INC) -Wl,-R$(INSTALLARCHLIB)/CORE \
> -Wl,-R$(PERL_ARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl
>
> If you have a local copy of libperl.so, it works (that's what it does at
> the moment). If not, it uses your default libperl.so (doesn't work now,
> a bug IMHO)
Why keep INSTALLARCHLIB in there? Why not
LLIBPERL=-L$(PERL_INC) -Wl,-R$(PERL_ARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl
I don't think it really means to be looking for a CORE in INSTALLARCHLIB
but rather meant PERL_ARCHLIB from the start and just got lucky because
unless you say otherwise INSTALLARCHLIB and PERL_ARCHLIB are the same.
Could you try this out:
--- lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm 4 Nov 2003 06:57:19 -0000 1.200
+++ lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm 6 Nov 2003 10:32:57 -0000
@@ -1083,9 +1083,9 @@
# platforms. We peek at lddlflags to see if we need -Wl,-R
# or -R to add paths to the run-time library search path.
if ($Config{'lddlflags'} =~ /-Wl,-R/) {
- $libs .= ' -L$(PERL_INC) -Wl,-R$(INSTALLARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl';
+ $libs .= ' -L$(PERL_INC) -Wl,-R$(PERL_ARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl';
} elsif ($Config{'lddlflags'} =~ /-R/) {
- $libs .= ' -L$(PERL_INC) -R$(INSTALLARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl';
+ $libs .= ' -L$(PERL_INC) -R$(PERL_ARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl';
}
}
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Playstation? Of course Perl runs on Playstation.
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi
