Hi, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Why keep INSTALLARCHLIB in there? Why not > > LLIBPERL=-L$(PERL_INC) -Wl,-R$(PERL_ARCHLIB)/CORE -lperl
it works in my case here without the INSTALLARCHLIB. However, I'm not sure which other packages may rely on INSTALLARCHLIB being part of the rpath. > I don't think it really means to be looking for a CORE in INSTALLARCHLIB > but rather meant PERL_ARCHLIB from the start and just got lucky because > unless you say otherwise INSTALLARCHLIB and PERL_ARCHLIB are the same. neither do I. best regards -- jochen
