This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

At the risk of annoying some colleagues and although I agree with Vladimiro as 
to the necessity of a critical edition, I would like to react to Vladimiro's 
last mail on the topic. 

We have got now several translations of the latter part of the title and, as 
Vladimiro already stated, not all of them are 100 % satisfactory, some being 
better than others, but we can learn from all of them. And as I believe sharing 
ideas in a non competitive way is the interesting part of this forum, I would 
like to share with those who are willing to read any further my thoughts while 
reading the different mails.

Lets go back to the text

"Universalis cosmographiae" (universal or whole cosmography) has no sense to 
me, as I said before. I prefer "universalis description" (general picture or 
representation, not description). On the other hand, if you translate 
"cosmographia" as "world", as Fisher-Wieser and Hessler have done in their 
work, you could argue in favor of the expression "universalis cosmographiae". 
And although Latin dictionaries (even of Medieval and Renaissance Latin) 
generally translate the word "cosmographia" as meaning "cosmography" or 
"cosmogony" (Isidore), I found one example which could confirm its translation 
as world, namely Theofridus Epternacensis (12th c.: Treveris est ingens urbs, 
gallica regna cohercens, Victrix milicia, dominatrix, altera Roma; Plebis 
scita, patres habet ac fora iuraque, leges; Est caput Europȩ, caput est quȩ 
cosmographyȩ). But perhaps there are more texts (i.e. technical treatises), 
esp. of the Renaissance, using the term in this sense. I am not a specialist in 
the field. 

Tam in solido quam plano: although I don't think there is much to discuss about 
its interpretation here - we find the expression back in the introduction 
itself and in the letter to Maximilian in relation to totius orbis typus - 
Dennis' translation as "in a manner both complete and intelligible" is not that 
far-fetched, on the contrary: the expression "in solidum" (not solido) can mean 
"globally" and "planum" in the expression "planum facere" does mean clearly.

The expression "eis... quae ... ignota a nuperis reperta sunt" is an 
interesting one, I think. It is generally taken as an allusion to the newly 
discovered lands and translated as such, but that is not exactly what the Latin 
says: the "ea quae ignota et reperta" are literally "things" (therefore Dennis' 
translation into "points") and allude to the differences of Waldseemuller's 
representation with Ptolemaeus'. These include of course the newly discovered 
lands, but not exclusively (cfr. the discussion on the equator on marine charts 
p. 37). And so the "nuperi" are perhaps the scholars as well as the explorers.


Wouter Bracke
Prenten, kaarten en plans - Estampes, cartes et plans
Koninklijke Bibliotheek van België - Bibliothèque royale de Belgique
Keizerslaan 4 - Boulevard de l'Empereur 4 
B 1000 Brussel - B 1000 Bruxelles

E-mail : [email protected] 
Tel.: 00.32.(0)2.519.57.43
Fax : 00.32.(0)2.519.57.42
website: http://www.kbr.be


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Vladimiro Valerio
Sent: mercredi 8 juin 2011 12:56
To: Discussion group for map history
Subject: [***SPAM***] - Re: [MapHist] Cosmographiae Introduction notes

This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to