Hello Bill et al, Having a good world map product at my disposal, I tried true radii around the city centroids and found that there seemed to be no place where they all intersect. Although a quick glance of the first two locations suggests somewhere in North America, some of the distances do not reach (even if you go via 180 degrees). From a scientific point of view, I would next explore the notion that the point is not on the Earth's surface. i.e. it is below the surface or up in space. I cannot think of non-brute force method to calculate the puzzle if it is what it seems. I noted that the distances given increment is more-or-less similar amounts and wonder if this is a clue. Perhaps it is a word puzzle (rather than a "world" one) and the names, increments or order are clues. You're right about MapInfo buffers... it one of the things I really hate about Pro. I first found this problem several years/releases ago when calculating ETOPs circles - the range an aircraft can fly when an engine fails. Although the distance tool uses a great circle calculation, buffers do not use true 3D geometry and I have seen huge errors on many occasions. The problem is very serious because users do have faith in MapInfo's output - after all, it is a "Professional" product and has the maturity of many releases. The problem has also cost me dearly... specifically a five figure dollar sum where one of my clients gave erroneous figures to the financial market community and I spent a long time unpaid clearing up the mess. That one bug cost me more money than I have ever made reselling MapInfo software (fortunately not from data too). I recall that a -L'er once reported that they had to go to court to explain that a construction(?) error was down to spherical rather than Cartesian area calculations. A misunderstanding of coordinate systems is one thing but this is even worse because it explicitly says "Spherical Buffer"... and that it is not. The problem seems to root from Pro using a single sample point to convert the required distance to a unit in degrees. While this may be fine for latitude units, it's no good for longitude as a unit in this direction changes with latitude (diminishing to zero at the poles). The errors can be most seen with "latitude-rich" polygons... try using a polygon for the country of Chile in tests. The error is the reason why buffers are always circular/oval and do not spread out towards the poles. The lack of support for 180 degrees is also a problem... Pro treats -180 and +180 longitude as "a world apart". The solution I used was to develop true 3D geometry for radii and, for shortest paths, a proper Great Circle/Arc utility. I took the publicly available PROJ4 code (fixed using WGS-84 datum) and made a MapBasic callable DLL out of it. Great circle paths and radii are now no problem. I now make large buffers by creating radii around each point in an object and combining the results. I'll intrigued to know the answer to the problem. I'm sure we will all kick ourselves. Regards, Warren Vick Europa Technologies Ltd, U.K. http://www.europa-tech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Thoen > Sent: 24 April 2001 16:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savants > > > Bill Huber wrote: > > ... As the problem is phrased, there is no fast, simple > procedure to get a practicably accurate answer. > > You may have put your finger on a clue here. I bet Jacques' observation > about units was also a hint. Hendry Flavio is on target too. Stanley Ng > also gets a nod for thinking outside the box (but I don't think "right > in front of you" is the answer.) I don't believe it's in space, nor at > the north pole. I think you can get the answer with simple deduction. I > see two clues that eliminate everywhere else but one place. > > I think the answer Vos Savant is looking for is how you might deduce the > location if you didn't have MapInfo (or Arc/Info, etc.) My guess is that > "where" may not necessarily be precise. We'll just have to wait until > she reveals the answer next Sunday. > > But I'm surprised that with all the GIS mapping power held by this group > that few have tried the obvious: map the cities, and draw circular > buffers around them at the specified distances. The precise place is the > one place where all the circles intersect. Right? But it doesn't work in > MapInfo because the distances are large ...which reveals a subtle > "Gotcha" that is lurking in MapInfo and probably most other mapping > packages. > > The "circular" buffers are not what you may think they are when they > would cross a pole. They compress, but this is not simple distortion due > to map projection. Load in the following table and create points on the > Lon/Lat columns with the "projection" set to Lat/Lon WGS 84. Then open > just the cities in a map window. Select Paris and create a 4658 mile > buffer around it. All the radii you can measure to the south are 4658 > miles, but to the north they are all short, with due north being the > worst. > > City Lon Lat Distance > Paris 2.432778 48.881389 4658 > Moscow 37.938056 55.764167 5438 > Tel Aviv 34.480000 32.050000 6681 > Victoria (Hong Kong) 114.177222 22.274167 7878 > Sydney 151.028056 -33.889722 8746 > Johannesburg 28.004167 -26.178889 9092 > > Begs the question, "What's the work-around?" I've also asked MI Tech > Support. > > - Bill Thoen > ------------------------------------------------------------ > GISnet, 1401 Walnut St., Suite C, Boulder, CO 80302 > tel: 303-786-9961, fax: 303-443-4856 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ctmap.com/gisnet > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com | > To unsubscribe, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > put "unsubscribe MapInfo-L" in the message body. > _______________________________________________________________________ List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com | To unsubscribe, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe MapInfo-L" in the message body.
RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savants
Warren Vick, Europa Technologies Ltd. Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:13:39 -0700
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Troy Wiora
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Kent Hargesheimer
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Peter Smith
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Bill Huber
- MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savants Alex Eshed
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... John Haynes
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for S... Marc Plato
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Bill Thoen
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for S... Bill Huber
- MI-L Info for XML addicts (or w... Eric
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Warren Vick, Europa Technologies Ltd.
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for S... John Haynes
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Atalanta33
- MI-L RE: A Mapping Puzzle: effe... Bill Huber
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... John Elliot
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... AYoung
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Burkmar Richard
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... David Booth
- Re: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... brian . forrester
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Lawley, Russell S
- RE: MI-L A Mapping Puzzle for Savant... Crompton, Mark
