Try the Geod software from NSW Dept Lands - it is free and was designed
precisely for the job you have in mind.
http://www.lpi.nsw.gov.au

John
----------------------------------
John Elliot
Anzeco Pty. Limited
mineral exploration consulting services
Bathurst, NSW 2795,  AUSTRALIA
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Data Directions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 18 December, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: MI-L Australian GDA94 projection issues


I have been having all sorts of problems with converting Australian
projections between AGD84 and GDA94, both as spherical and cartesian
coordinates.

I have MapInfo data in AGD84. I go through the conversion process to GDA94
using various methods (FME some time ago, and now via ESRI ArcTools) and end
up with a dataset projected in GDA94. However, when I overlay this data with
the original AGD84 data, there is only about a 3 metre offset, not the 200
metre offset that it should be.

But if during the conversion process, I set the coordinate system to GDA94
again, and then overlay the original GDA94 data with the converted data,
there is the 200 metre (or so offset).

In a nutshell, my processing steps are:

  1.. From MapInfo, export the source AGD84 table as MID/MIF format.
  2.. In ArcToolBox, convert the MIF to a Shapefile, assign the source
projection (AGD84) and then specify the projection going to (GDA94).
  3.. Go back to MapInfo (v7.5) and import the Shapefile, selecting GDA94 as
the projection. This results in only a 3 metre offset. But at this stage, if
I import the Shapefile and select AGD84 (the original projection), the 200
metre offset is apparent.
Are there any ideas what is going on? Will sum.
Many thanks,
Bill


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 9630

Reply via email to