Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archie-

I upgraded from a Pentium 133Mhz w/64MB and 2Mb video to a P2 300Mhz w/128MB and
8 Mb Ram.  I experienced more than 3X improvement over the 133Mhz, mostly due to
the AGP vid card.  Most noticeable was the screen redraw.  100K points used to 
take 30+ seconds, now it's down to <5 secs.

>From my experience, buy as big as you can afford!

HTH

-Dave Langdon
 GIS Analyst
 Rotary Offset Press
 Kent, WA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: MI how to post a message ?
Author:  "Archie Pedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Internet
Date:    12/30/98 12:05 AM


Here is the message I would like to post:
     
I have a client who currently uses MapInfo 4.5 in Windows 95, P133Mhz, 32 MB 
RAM. 
He has been importing large DXF files (40-50 MB each) containing contours and is
using the Universal Translator within MapInfo to convert them into MIF. 
According to him
it is taking too long. He would also like to use Vertical Mapper within MapInfo 
to do some 3-D modelling of the contours.
     
He would like to upgrade his computer to allow faster processing of these files.
He wanted to know if he could harness the Pentium 2 technology (dual processor) 
with MapInfo or what would be the optimal solution to get the most bang for his 
buck.
     
He needs to know what size of CPU, RAM, Video graphics card is going to give him
the most optimal speed yet still be inexpensive. Should he use a 300 MHz CPU 
with a 128 MB of RAM with a 8 MB video accelerator card. Will this make a lot of
difference in processing power for his application ? Should he go
higher than this or will it really make much difference ?
     
I appreciate you listening to this request and I look forward to your response.
     
Please send your response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you get a chance.
     
Thank you.
     
     
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Here is the message I would like to 
post:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="" size=2>I have a client who currently uses 
MapInfo 4.5 in Windows 95, P133Mhz, 32 MB RAM. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="" size=3></FONT>He has been importing large DXF 
files (40-50 MB each) containing contours and is using the Universal Translator 
within MapInfo to convert them into MIF. According to him</DIV>
<DIV>it is taking too long. He would also like to use Vertical Mapper within 
MapInfo to do some 3-D modelling of the contours.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>He would like to upgrade his computer to allow faster processing of these 
files. He wanted to know if he could harness the Pentium 2 technology (dual 
processor) with MapInfo or what would be the optimal solution to get the most 
bang for his buck.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>He needs to know what size of CPU, RAM, Video graphics card is going to 
give him the most optimal speed yet still be inexpensive. Should he use a 300 
MHz CPU with a 128 MB of RAM with a 8 MB video accelerator card. Will this make 
a lot of difference in processing power for his application ? Should he go</DIV>
<DIV>higher than this or will it really make much difference ?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I appreciate you listening to this request and I look forward to your 
response.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Please send your response to <A 
href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> when you

get a chance.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thank you.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Received: from seatimes.seatimes.com (192.251.219.14) by ccmail.seatimes.com
with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.11 Enterprise) id 000B9592; Tue, 29 Dec 98 22:17:59
-0800
Received: from lists.sni.net (lists.sni.net [199.117.27.1])
        by seatimes.seatimes.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA09777
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 22:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordo@localhost)
        by lists.sni.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA18067
        for mapinfo-l-include; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:50:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from mailman.sni.net (mailman.sni.net [199.117.27.25])
        by lists.sni.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA18063
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:50:31 -0700 (MST)
Received: from smtp2.globalserve.net (smtp2.globalserve.net [209.90.128.7])
        by mailman.sni.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA02465
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  mail_from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:50:28 -0700 (MST)
Received: from default (dialin966.toronto.globalserve.net [209.90.133.203])
        by smtp2.globalserve.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id XAA12346
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 23:52:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <009101be33b1$f9ba0ba0$cb855ad1@default>
Reply-To: "Archie Pedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Archie Pedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MI how to post a message ?
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 00:05:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008E_01BE3388.0FE09D60"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk

Reply via email to