Bob,
With labels, there are pros and cons to both the method used in version 3
and version 4.
In versions 4+, there is a .mbx that ships with MapInfo that works just like
the labels in 3.0
What we really need is an automatic way to seperate labels!
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: John Wall and Assocaites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, January 22, 1999 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: MI Ancient Version (ver.3.0.5)
>i remember 3.0.5
>
>i remember the upgrade to 3.1 as the best ever mapinfo upgrade.
>
>we are stopped at version 4.02 until mapinfo comes up with something
>significant to sell us.
>
>in fact, since maptitude makes better thematic maps anyway, i might
>downgrade from 4.02 to 3.1, since the lable function is so much easier to
>use.
>
>bob rogers
>john wall and associates
>planning analysis and design.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Friday, January 22, 1999 11:52 AM
>Subject: MI Ancient Version (ver.3.0.5)
>
>
>>
>>
>>Help! I am using the ancient version (ver. 3.0.5). Is anybody out there
>>familiar with it?
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
