+1 for a seperate module in hadoop-mapreduce-project. I think hadoop-mapreduce-client might not be right place for it. We might have to pick a new maven module under hadoop-mapreduce-project that could host streaming/distcp/hadoop archives.
thanks mahadev On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Agree, it should be a separate maven module. > > And it should be under hadoop-mapreduce-client, right? > > And now that we are in the topic, the same should go for streaming, no? > > Thanks. > > Alejandro > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Eli Collins <e...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > Nice work! I definitely think this should go in 23 and 20x. >> > >> > Agree with JD that it should be in the core code, not contrib. If >> > it's going to be maintained then we should put it in the core code. >> >> Now that we're all mavenized, though, a separate maven module and >> artifact does make sense IMO - ie "hadoop jar >> hadoop-distcp-0.23.0-SNAPSHOT" rather than "hadoop distcp" >> >> -Todd >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >
