no, I haven't made myself clear....

I have already got the geocodes for 12million address records..I want to use 
those as my geocoding data base to geocode others....i.e use a point file to 
gecode against and not a street (line) file...

Thanks for that though, your response is appreciated...

Nick




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: fairplan2000 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:07 AM
  Subject: [Maptitude] Re: Maptitude and DBMS


  Nick,

  Regarding geocoding 12 million address records: In 2004, I used 
  Maptitude to geocode about 14 million street addresses of registered 
  voters in Ohio and Michigan. I split the address files in half for 
  both states. All told, it took about 48 hours of uninterrupted 
  computer time to complete on a Pentium 3 with a gigabyte of RAM. 
  About 98% of the addresses geocoded "normal" or "strict".

  I recall that the Michigan file was 14 gigabytes before I eliminated 
  unnecessary fields. It opened swiftly in Maptitude -- max file size 
  for MS Access at the time was 2 gigabytes.

  Bill
  www.fairdata2000.com

  --- In [email protected], "Nick Nicholas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  wrote:
  >
  > sounds like time for another wish list.....
  > 
  > here's my wish 
  > 
  > 1/ I have a data base of 12million address points (all of 
  Australia) that I would love to set up for geocoding. There are a 
  bunch of restrictions as to the size of the geocoding index file that 
  could probably be overcome wth some clever programming - 
  unfortunately, I'm not that clever...
  > 
  > 2/ I'd love to be able to "dumb-down" Maptitude and customize the 
  menus easily. I have clients who only use the software for 2 or 3 
  applications and so don't need the full capabilities and don't 
  speak "GIS"..the ideal is to relabel some buttons for them (and yes I 
  know that GISDK can do this but see my note on not being that 
  clever...)
  > 
  > 3/ I'd like to see some enhenacements of the data summary file so 
  that I can create a summary based on a template, nicely laid out etc. 
  I currently do that by either dropping summary file into EXCEL and 
  manipulating or using a report generator package
  > 
  > 
  > Just an observation that Dick Hoskins's requirements are orientated 
  around the visual/land use functionality and mine around the 
  reporting side. That no doubt reflects the different markets in which 
  we operate - perhaps that's the clue - Maptitude witha "Business 
  Template", a "Land Use" Template, "Health 
  Template", "Location/Allocation template"...etc..etc..
  > 
  > 
  > Nick Nicholas
  > The Demographer's Workshop
  > 17 Karilla Ave
  > Lane Cove, NSW, 2066
  > Australia
  > 
  > T: 61-9418-3393
  > M: 0404-097-269
  > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > web: www.thedemographer.net.au
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: Dick Hoskins 
  > To: [email protected] 
  > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 2:44 AM
  > Subject: RE: [Maptitude] Maptitude and DBMS
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > Concering the comment about Maptitude's raster capacity, 
  Maptitude does NOT do much "handling" of raster imagery. Putting a 
  picture layer on a map is nice, used it a lot, but that's really not 
  much. Hopefully version 5 will have some significant raster 
  capacity. If I need to do anything in raster - which is occuring more 
  frequently - I use Idrisi for raster work but that is quite 
  expensive, but it has weak vector capacity, and it is a pain to get 
  it to interfacwe with anything else. Idrisi folks are just down the 
  road from Newton, maybe they could get together ... 
  > 
  > In 4.8 the addition of the the TerraServer capability has been 
  useful but unfortunately there are some serious errors in the imagery 
  itself in my state - and I cannot find anyway to notify TerraServer 
  developers about the problem. My town (Olympia, WA) has some panels 
  which have nothing to do with Olympia. Same in other areas. Of course 
  this is not Caliper's problem. 
  > 
  > A connection to Google Map would be handy. I use it all the time. 
  > 
  > It is hartening that there are GISs around that ordinary folks 
  can afford, Maptitude and Manifold, and some pretty good open source 
  ones. I checked out Manifold in detail; I would imagine Caliper has 
  done the same. The need for spatial SQL in Maptitude is noted among 
  other things, thematic mapping needs a complete re-work, but the ease 
  of use remains and for the users I work with, Maptitude works. But 
  the public health community is still drinking the ESRI Koolaide. I 
  estimate that 90% of ESRI software sold to health departments is on 
  the shelf. Make that 95%. 
  > 
  > Manifold has lots and lots of capacity, but it is not easy to 
  learn. It is not for beginners or impatient intermediates. If one is 
  already skilled at using another GIS I think the learning curve is 
  steaper. In my view the operational paradigm in Manifold is of of 
  whack. Many processes are just plain difficult for no good reason. 
  > 
  > I am always looking for GISs that health departments with scant 
  technical resources can use, and Manifold would likely not be one of 
  them. It is 1/2 the price of Maptitude, but using that as a criterion 
  for buying it would backfire. Maptitude can exist in an environment 
  with a single unsophisticated user and it can be used effectively. 
  Most software cannot because having someone close at hand is still 
  the best way to get up and going or resolve a problem. If you are 
  alone with Manifold or ArcGIS and you get confused, if you do not 
  have someone around you can ask soon and face-to-face, you just get 
  more and more frustrated until you give up.
  > 
  > I have seen Maptitude used in places that are pretty remote and 
  small and they function just fine because the help is pretty good 
  (but it needs work) and the manual can be read by ordinary non-GIS 
  people. Most of those places have good Internet connectivity now so 
  they can get more help. 
  > 
  > Like ESRI stuff, for users that need GIS but are not in love with 
  GIS, 2 weeks away from Manifold and ESRI likely means starting over. 
  I have heard many times that when users come back to Mapitude one can 
  still make it work. 
  > 
  > Then again, I hope Caliper has looked closely at Manifold to see 
  what they offer. There raster capacity is pretty impressive.
  > 
  > Dick Hoskins
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > ----------------------------------------------------------
  ----------
  > From: [email protected] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aniruddha Banerjee
  > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:23 PM
  > To: [email protected]
  > Subject: [Maptitude] Maptitude and DBMS
  > 
  > 
  > Hi all (and especially the Caliper software architects):
  > 
  > I put in the following comments in a GIS blog (website: 
  http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2006/12/21/fighting-manifold-or-
  fighting-the-way-ive-learned-gis/ ). Feel free to comment on it since 
  I find some rather inaccurate comments (from Dimitri) about 
  Maptitude....(you are welcome to respond)
  > 
  > Here's the partial text:
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > #
  > 
  > Rudy // Mar 31, 2007 at 4:26 pm 
  > 
  > I've used all kinds of GIS since the DOS days (15 years and 
  counting) and I can assure you that by far the best GIS software is 
  Maptitude from Caliper Corporation. It is a vector GIS software that 
  can also read and handle raster imagery. It's native database 
  management is vastly superior to any other GIS (can handle all the 
  TIGER line files of the US in one shot; it can handle one billion!! 
  records and one million fields - unlike MS access that allows only 
  256 fields). It can read oracle and other DBMS without using 
  programming. An upgrade to TransCAD (another product from Caliper) 
  allows you to perform redistricting using integer programming and 
  other graph theoretic methods (invert matrices and store matrices of 
  25 K in native format). I can go on and I am happy to debate on this 
  issue. Oh BTY I have an advanced ArcIMS certificate from ESRI for 
  which my previous employer paid 1000s. I use C++ and R to do 
  programming but was never required to program for my GIS stuff. Now 
  that's a great software. Isn't it? 
  > 
  > Rudy B., PhD
  > Berkeley, CA 
  > #
  > 
  > 82 Dimitri // Apr 1, 2007 at 9:25 am 
  > 
  > For all of its limitations I don't think anyone would describe 
  Maptitude as other than as a competent and pleasant GIS. It is well-
  matched to its target market and has a good following. 
  > 
  > Despite its many limitations (no IMS, small number of importable 
  formats, etc.), if you think it is the best GIS ever, well, you are 
  entitled to your opinion. What makes for "best" in someone's eyes is 
  not necessarily the most features or the most sophisticated 
  capabilities but the right balance for that someone's particular 
  needs. 
  > 
  > But this bit. "It's native database management is vastly superior 
  to any other GIS " .is utterly silly, as Maptitude (for all of its 
  other benefits) is rather well-known for having particularly weak 
  DBMS capabilities. 
  > 
  > I grant you that Maptitude may be improving its products and so 
  is getting better at DBMS, but if memory serves me right (as assisted 
  by a quick review of the Caliper website), it seems that the 
  following gross DBMS limitations to Maptitude still apply: 
  > 
  > To take the most obvious, Maptitude connects to DBMS using ODBC, 
  a terribly obsolete way to go. GIS packages with better DBMS 
  capability can connect using more modern technologies such as OLE DB 
  or ADO .NET. Connecting to SQL Server using OLE DB is about 600 times 
  faster, read/write, than using ODBC, so this is a very big deal. 
  > 
  > Although Maptitude is said to be able to read "oracle spatial 
  tables" (a particularly weird way of phrasing the matter, as if there 
  is a host of "gotcha's" waiting in the wings), there is no mention of 
  any sophisticated ability to do read/write/edits with many 
  simultaneous users as is normally desired with Oracle Spatial, nor of 
  projection matching on the fly nor of any support for GeoRasters, nor 
  of storing formatting and other key drawing characteristics. All 
  those things are necessary if you are really working with Oracle 
  Spatial as a fully capable client and not just as some "read-only" 
  usage of Oracle as a one-way data source. I grant you it is cool that 
  Maptitude can read Oracle spatial data at all, but to do so in what 
  is apparently a highly limited way is not the way one wins standing 
  as "vastly superior." 
  > 
  > For that matter, if you really are on top of your DBMS game 
  you'll be able to read/write/edit not just Oracle spatial but a host 
  of different geometry-in-DBMS data types and DBMS systems, including, 
  for example OGC WKB and WKT, ESRI-style geometry and so on in other 
  DBMS packages, such as SQL Server. Don't see any of that in 
  Maptitude. 
  > 
  > There is no trace of spatial SQL within Maptitude, something 
  you'd expect any GIS laying claim to serious chops in the DBMS world 
  to offer. If you can't do spatial SQL you're just not in the DBMS 
  game in GIS, not even at the beginner level let alone as the best. 
  > 
  > I'll skip over the hundreds of small, but useful, capabilities 
  that a truly DBMS-capable GIS has and Maptitude does not (example: 
  right click on a column and choose "change type" to instantly change 
  type. ) and conclude with a very telling "big" thing: zero support 
  for 64-bit code and multicore processors. Modern DBMS is multi-
  threaded. If you can't run multiple threads to your DBMS connection 
  you're stuck in the dark ages. 
  > 
  > To shift gears away from DBMS to programming, since your post 
  indicated a certain excitement at not having to do programming to do 
  GIS stuff: not since the dark ages has any modern, interactive GIS 
  required you towrite code to do GIS stuff, so don't be too excited 
  that this is the case with Maptitude. 
  > 
  > It's a bit like a country cousin coming to the city and acting 
  astonished there is indoor plumbing. The indoor plumbing is indeed 
  great, but one should not betray too much astonishment at 
  encountering such a convenience, which is taken for granted in modern 
  times. :-) 
  > 
  > I don't mean any of the above as a slam at Maptitude because I 
  happen to like that software and admire it. I especially admire 
  Maptitude because together with packages like Manifold it helps set 
  the precedent that one can get truly useful and pleasant GIS for a 
  fraction of the cost of legacy stuff like ESRI. People in mainstream 
  software markets understand that, but every bit of re-education helps 
  for those folks still stuck in legacy notions of price/performance. 
  So we should all praise Maptitude for helping move GIS into modern 
  notions of price/performance. 
  > 
  > But on the way to praising Maptitude there is no need for 
  inaccuracy, and suggesting Maptitude is the best GIS there is at DBMS 
  is very far from the truth, hence this correction. 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > ----------------------------------------------------------
  ----------
  > 
  > 
  > No virus found in this incoming message.
  > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/743 - Release Date: 
  02/04/2007 16:24
  >



   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/743 - Release Date: 02/04/2007 
16:24

Reply via email to