> On March 9, 2015, 8:35 p.m., Dennis Nienhüser wrote:
> > Good catch. Can you also extend the current TestEquality::polygonTest() in 
> > tests/TestEquality.cpp such that it fails unless your patch is applied?

Sure. Done!


- Boris


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122854/#review77229
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 10, 2015, 4:32 a.m., Boris Egorov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122854/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 10, 2015, 4:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Marble.
> 
> 
> Repository: marble
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We should compare GeoDataLinearRing's of different GeoDataPolygon's, not
> one with itself. Check that in TestEquality::polygonTest().
> 
> Issue detected by Cppcheck: "Same expression on both sides of '!='."
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/lib/marble/geodata/data/GeoDataPolygon.cpp 9ae7091 
>   tests/TestEquality.cpp a3f5498 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122854/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Boris Egorov
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Marble-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/marble-devel

Reply via email to