> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J.D. > Falk > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 1:23 PM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: Re: [marf] FW: Feedback on: ARF feedback type Virus/_report > subdomain > > Using ARF for reports from MUAs has been discussed many times, but > hasn't really ever been implemented (except for a Thunderbird plugin, > years ago, now lost to history.) I'd love to see somebody try it, but > until they do I don't think we can call it a common practice.
However, "Report Spam" buttons, including ours, do send proprietary feedback of some kind in a lot of instances. Having an ARF implementation would be great. Maybe we should chase down that Thunderbird plugin... :-) > MARF is already widely accepted. There are dozens of report generators > and literally thousands of report consumers, nearly all following the > use case described in draft-jdfalk-marf-as. That's part of why there's > disagreement -- we don't want to change MARF in ways which would be > incompatible with the established userbase. There are some people in MAAWG from the AV vendors. I wonder if they'd be interested in FBLs that use ARF for the purpose of reporting suspected virus payloads. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
