In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f13512df...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 08/18/2011
at 03:47 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>To the general question of sending malware payloads in ARF reports,
>perhaps this is something JD could add to the reporting discovery
>draft, i.e., whether or not an FBL consumer expresses willingness to
>accept malware payloads.
How about a separate flag as to whether the consumer wants full text,
only header or full text except for malware?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf