> -----Original Message----- > From: John Levine [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 3:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy > Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt > > >> Message-ID: this is just wrong, RFC 5965 does not report it. > > > >I don't agree with this one. What's wrong with adding this here even > >though RFC5965 doesn't include it? > > What's the point? Neither SPF nor DKIM use it. It's in the copy of > the message if you want it, just like all the other headers.
I thought the idea is that the second MIME part of a multipart/report includes things that might be keys to searching logs or otherwise uniquely identifying the message at the sender's side, as well as including the technical specifics of the report. But you're right that it's duplicated data if the third part is included, and for ARF it always is. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
