On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]>wrote:
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > > Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 6:57 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [marf] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-05 > > > > In <[email protected]>, on 12/02/2011 > > at 02:25 PM, S Moonesamy <[email protected]> said: > > > > >It can be argued either way. The Abstract Section mentions "an > > >extension report type to ARF". > > > > How about making it singular but adding a phrase "affecting multiple > > registries"? > > >That would probably be fine too. > ok so ... an extension report type to ARF affecting multiple entries for use in reporting messages that fail one or more authentication checks performed on receipt of a message... would that work? > > _______________________________________________ > marf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf >
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
