I suggest putting commas around "affecting multiple registries", but otherwise it's fine.
From: Hilda Fontana [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 9:25 AM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: Message Abuse Report Format working group Subject: Re: [marf] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-05 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of > Shmuel Metz > Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 6:57 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [marf] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-05 > > In > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > on 12/02/2011 > at 02:25 PM, S Moonesamy > <[email protected]<mailto:sm%[email protected]>> said: > > >It can be argued either way. The Abstract Section mentions "an > >extension report type to ARF". > > How about making it singular but adding a phrase "affecting multiple > registries"? >That would probably be fine too. ok so ... an extension report type to ARF affecting multiple entries for use in reporting messages that fail one or more authentication checks performed on receipt of a message... would that work? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
