In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 01/25/2012
at 10:06 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>> 1. End-users report to mailbox providers, they shouldn't go
>> searching whois databases and similar stuff. This point is
>> partially repeated already in Section 8, where it says that
>> sending criteria "might include direct complaint submissions
>> from MUAs". Using ARF for MUA-to-MP is not discussed.
>I think "direct complaint submissions" in this context means that an
>unsolicited report is triggered by MUA action, not that the MUA
>complains directly to something found in a WHOIS database. I'll
>adjust the wording.
I thought that the wording was clear[1], since the provider would
hardly be forwarding reports not sent to it. However, I don't agree
that the end users shouldn't send reports to addresses located in
whois, only that it needs to be done carefully.
[1] Which doesn't preclude rewording it if that helps
other readers.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
