On 03.01.2012 21:11, SM wrote: > At 04:38 29-12-2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> Sections 6 and 7 are dedicated to solicited feedback. However, there >> is a number of points that should be valid also for unsolicited >> reports. If the order is not important, the common points could be >> put in a common section. > > It's the beginning of the year. I have some difficulty understanding what > changes you suggested.
Moving the paragraphs from those numbered lists would alter their numeration. Personally, I don't like them to be numbered, since the numbers bear no special meaning. The subcompact feature worsens their appearance by suggesting some sort of indivisibility. I tend to associate that style with some (mis)conceptions about ASes, and IMHO is unnecessary. If denumbered, some of those paragraphs could be moved in a new section to be entitled, say, "Handling Common to Both Solicited and Unsolicited Reports". >> [Manual vs automated processing] concept needs to be stated, though. >> The beginning of the third paragraph of Section 8 can be changed so as >> to read like so: >> >> Recipients of unsolicited ARF reports SHOULD, in general, handle them >> the same way as any other abuse reports. However, they can take >> advantage of the ARF format to automate processing. Lacking [etc.] > > I don't understand what change you are asking for as there is such text in > Section 8. Yup, I just inserted the second sentence. > Could you ask the editor of the document to generate a revision with your > changes as it would be easier to read and comment? I would post a patch, but I cannot find the xml anymore. So Murray has to insert those two snippets of text, if he likes to, from my previous message http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01605.html I'd guess that's possible, since the concept was discussed already here http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01223.html And the converse concept was discussed after I asked whether MUAs should allow users to edit the human readable part, about here http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/abuse-feedback-report/2009q3/000411.html > In my opinion, the document needs much more work to be ready for a Last Call. +1, for the "unsolicited" part in particular _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
