In <[email protected]>, on 02/02/2012
at 02:16 AM, "John Levine" <[email protected]> said:
>Look at RFC 2119. SHOULD NOT more or less means don't do this unless
>you're sure you understand what you're doing. Given how few mail
>users understand header parsing and mail routing, SHOULD NOT seems
>right to me.
One would hope that the author of such a tool would understand header
parsing and mail routing. Of course, correct operation would still
require that the user be able to count.
>If you, one of the few users familiar with the details of SMTP mail,
>want to do it, go ahead. For the bazillion users of some random
>consumer mail system, let their mail system admins handle it.
Who's going to bell the cat? Currently, a lot of e-mail admins don't
provide the function of collecting abuse complaints and forwarding
them to the proper recipients.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
