In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/04/2012
at 09:01 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>Agree with the "some".
I notice "some" that it isn't in draft-ietf-marf-as-06.txt; is that
deliberate or inadvertent?
8. Generating and Handling Unsolicited Reports
13. Experience suggests use of ARF is advisable in most contexts.
Automated recipient systems can handle abuse reports sent in
ARF
format at least as well as any other format such as plain
text,
with or without a copy of the message attached. That holds
even
for systems that did not request ARF format reports, provided
that reports are generated with use by recipients not using
automated ARF parsing in mind. Anyone sending unsolicited
reports in ARF format can legitimately presume that recipients
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
