> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-marf-as-05 > > It looks good to me. Just a couple of comments: > > 3. The Mailbox Provider SHOULD send reports to relevant parties who > have requested to receive such reports. The reports MUST be > formatted per [RFC5965], and transmitted as an email message > ([RFC5322]), typically using SMTP ([RFC5321]). The process > whereby such parties may request the reports is discussed in > Section 3.5 of [RFC6449]. > > Although I understad the MUST here in context, it could be misread out > of context by people trying to insist on ARF. Could we have some kind > of "To implement the recommendations of this draft, the reports MUST > ..." or similar?
Seems reasonable to me. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
