Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>If people don't like that idea, then I would instead suggest at >>>least removing them from one of the two -reporting drafts and having >>>that one reference the other one. >> >> I don't like that. If the text is moved to a single document, it >> should not be one specific to DKIM or SPF. AS is a better place to >> park it. > >I agree, as participant and as document shepherd. >Barry Why the AS draft? There are tons of non-spam auth failures. These are often the most interesting ones. If this belongs in the AS draft then it's probably misnamed. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
