"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >Of Scott Kitterman >> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:30 PM >> To: Message Abuse Report Format working group >> Subject: Re: [marf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-marf-as-05 >> >> >Unsolicited reports sent from an undeliverable address aren't >terribly >> >useful, as you can't ask the sender for additional context (data >that's >> >already there for FBLs). They're also more likely to be discarded or >> >blocked. >> > >> >I think the SHOULD is a reasonable level of strength (though I >wouldn't >> >object to MUST). >> >> That's a much better rationale. The draft should leave the SHOULD >and >> add that. > >Done in -06. > >I take it you are both otherwise happy with the AS draft as-is? Yes. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
