> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:30 PM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: Re: [marf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-marf-as-05 > > >Unsolicited reports sent from an undeliverable address aren't terribly > >useful, as you can't ask the sender for additional context (data that's > >already there for FBLs). They're also more likely to be discarded or > >blocked. > > > >I think the SHOULD is a reasonable level of strength (though I wouldn't > >object to MUST). > > That's a much better rationale. The draft should leave the SHOULD and > add that.
Done in -06. I take it you are both otherwise happy with the AS draft as-is? -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
