On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 10:50 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: [snip] > (2) Do you think the 'creative' sublogos approach is entirely more > risk > than it is worth? Should we just not allow for sublogos, or only > allow > for sublogos that use the 'stock' GNOME foot logomark? [snip]
Máirín is asking this partly because I think that some of the existing sub-logos on that page break our own rules about how to use the logo. For instance, not using complex pattern fills (instead of a solid color), and not letting other elements (the cup or the brush) overlap or collide with the logo. I think these rules are important - to keep the brand visually distinct and - because I think the lawyers told the board that it was necessary. Thanks Máirín. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
