<quote who="Máirín Duffy"> > (1) Are there any objections to the proposed sublogo guidelines? Do you > think they are too restrictive or too permissive?
> (3) Do you think having an approval system for sublogos would be an > acceptable requirement? Should we contact a lawyer to get some advice? An approvals process is entirely reasonable. > (2) Do you think the 'creative' sublogos approach is entirely more risk > than it is worth? Should we just not allow for sublogos, or only allow > for sublogos that use the 'stock' GNOME foot logomark? Something for us to take to the lawyers. There are some certification marks that I would like to develop, based on the GNOME logo. They're sufficiently important that they can't be confused with other sublogo designs. I'll chat to you about this off-list, so we can get something designed and published in the brand guidelines, and so no one makes conflicting sublogo designs. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ Broken hearts rarely come with "Some Assembly Required" stickers. -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
