Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > So for a while now I've been working at establishing a set of guidelines > for the GNOME brand, including the GNOME logo. An issue has come up and > I wanted to ask you all for your thoughts on it: The GNOME 'sublogo' > guidelines [1] may be of concern with respect to the defensibility of > the GNOME foot's trademark. (See discussion at [2]). > > So my questions for you folks are: > > (1) Are there any objections to the proposed sublogo guidelines? Do you > think they are too restrictive or too permissive? > > (2) Do you think the 'creative' sublogos approach is entirely more risk > than it is worth? Should we just not allow for sublogos, or only allow > for sublogos that use the 'stock' GNOME foot logomark? > > (3) Do you think having an approval system for sublogos would be an > acceptable requirement? Should we contact a lawyer to get some advice? > > Discuss! :) > > Thanks, > ~m > > > [1] > http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines?action=show#head-fd7481407393ff9e54fae8ed1d9f8323547ea88b > > [2] http://mihmo.livejournal.com/31832.html > > [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines > Hi Máirín Thanks for working on this, it totally rocks to have something like this! Approving sublogos sounds like a great idea, the Java GNOME logo for example hurts my eyes a bit, but the other examples works quite well. - Andreas
-- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
