On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:38:37PM +0000, Sally Khudairi wrote: > Ack + thanks. You caught a good one. I'll add the "with". > > Marketing/PMC-folk: I presume you're OK with the addition as well?
Yup > > -Sally > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kelceydamage@bbits" <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Cc: Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]>; Chip Childers > > <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]>; Sally Khudairi > > <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013, 12:35 > > Subject: Re: REVISED (was Re: Talking Points for Graduation) > > > > I can't help but feel this is grammatically incorrect: > > > > "It has been proven to be both stable and highly scalable, underpinning > > production clouds more than 30,000 physical nodes, in geo-distributed > > environments." > > > > Pretty certain it's missing a "with", as in "underpinning > > production clouds with...." > > > > Thanks > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Sally Khudairi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> It has been proven to be both stable and highly scalable, underpinning > > production clouds more than 30,000 physical nodes, in geo-distributed > > environments. > > >
