Thanks. One more +1 and we'll be good to go. 

JUST CONFIRMING before I send this out under embargo: what is our targeted 
distribution time for Monday? 8AM ET? Earlier perhaps for global/Euro coverage?
 
Cheers,
Sally


----- Original Message -----
> From: Chip Childers <[email protected]>
> To: Sally Khudairi <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Kelceydamage@bbits" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>; Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]>; 
> "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013, 12:43
> Subject: Re: REVISED (was Re: Talking Points for Graduation)
> 
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:38:37PM +0000, Sally Khudairi wrote:
>>  Ack + thanks. You caught a good one. I'll add the "with".
>> 
>>  Marketing/PMC-folk: I presume you're OK with the addition as well?
> 
> Yup
> 
>> 
>>  -Sally
>>   
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  > From: "Kelceydamage@bbits" <[email protected]>
>>  > To: "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
>>  > Cc: Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]>; Chip Childers 
> <[email protected]>; 
> "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>; Sally Khudairi 
> <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>  > Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2013, 12:35
>>  > Subject: Re: REVISED (was Re: Talking Points for Graduation)
>>  > 
>>  > I can't help but feel this is grammatically incorrect:
>>  > 
>>  > "It has been proven to be both stable and highly scalable, 
> underpinning 
>>  > production clouds more than 30,000 physical nodes, in geo-distributed 
>>  > environments."
>>  > 
>>  > Pretty certain it's missing a "with", as in 
> "underpinning 
>>  > production clouds with...."
>>  > 
>>  > Thanks
>>  > 
>>  > Sent from my iPhone
>>  > 
>>  > On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Sally Khudairi 
> <[email protected]> 
>>  > wrote:
>>  > 
>>  >>  It has been proven to be both stable and highly scalable, 
> underpinning 
>>  > production clouds more than 30,000 physical nodes, in geo-distributed 
>>  > environments.
>>  >
>> 
>

Reply via email to