Hi Mark, What was the subject/date of the thread with ConCom? I was unable to find it in my archives. (Likely an error on my part.)
Thanks, On 21 April 2013 00:07, Mark Hinkle <mark.hin...@citrix.com> wrote: > I got permission for the conference back in February from ConCom. Nick B. > asked that we meet the requirements to have reps from more than two > organizations on the planning committee. I thought we sent it to private > but those archives aren't trasnparent so I cat confirm we also discussed > on the public list with no objections. > > We have included Chip Childers, John Kinsella, David Nalley and Joe > Brockmeier from the PMC to fulfill the requirements of having members from > multiple organizations on the planning committee. > > We met on Friday and agreed we'd make the site live and let the marketing > list know that it was live so we could get feedback and make sure all > trademarks are applied properly. We agreed to make sure any changes > happened as soon as possible if there were errors. > > I thought I jumped through every possible hoop here but if there's > something I missed I'd be glad to do something else. > > Mark > > > > > On 4/20/13 6:40 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > >On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've not been involved in many conferences related to Apache products, > >>so > >> my advice here is not representative of policy. Just what seems like > >>might > >> be a good idea based on what I know. > >> > >> Ideally, the plans for this conference would have been run past the > >> CloudStack PMC, ConCom, and Brand before we went live with it. > >>Conferences > >> need approval from these groups. But what's done is done. > >> > >> However, it might be a good idea to run it past them now, as we do need > >>to > >> establish that approval retroactively. > >> > >> Perhaps send a message to tradema...@apache.org, CCing > >> priv...@cloudstack.apache.org, detailing the ways in which you are > using > >> the Apache CloudStack trademarks, and the steps you have taken to make > >>sure > >> they are used responsibly. > >> > >> Perhaps send a message to con...@apache.org, CCing > >> priv...@cloudstack.apache.org, detailing the plans for the conference. > >>(I > >> am not sure what specific information ConCom are looking for. But see > >>Ross > >> Gardler's recent thread on d...@cloudstack.apache.org for more context. > >>For > >> smaller events it looks like this sort of thing is not important, but > >> ConCom certainly need to be involved for any conference level events.) > >> > >> There's an active thread about how PMC oversight works for trademarks > >>and > >> events and what have you, that I haven't followed up on yet. (Sorry > >>about > >> that.) But until we have something ratified, I am assuming that approval > >> for things like this can be done via lazy consensus. i.e. This thread, > >>and > >> two separates threads as detailed above, copying the PMC, should be > >>enough. > >> (Assuming nobody raises objections within 72 hours.) > >> > >> Chip, or anyone else from the PMC, feel free to correct me on any of > >>this! > >> > > > >My understanding based on this thread: > >http://cloudstack.markmail.org/thread/eufkzvnt6v3mz4n6 > > > >is that concom was pinged back in February, but I can't verify as I am > >not on concom and can't peruse the archives. In the referenced thread, > >8 PMC members participated and seemed to all be for the event, so I > >don't think that PMC approval is an issue. > > > >--David > > -- NS
