On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 04:29:53PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm. Good point. Though, that depends on how likely ConCom are to turn > > around and say "well, it doesn't matter that nobody responded, you have to > > shut this down now." I think they would be more likely to concede it was > > their mistake and not pursue it. But, I don't know. I don't even have that > > much experience with them. I certainly don't speak for them. > > > > If you want to get involved, I suggest you subscribe to > > [email protected] post a message. (It is a private list, but open > > to all committers.) > > (Admittedly, their list of mailing lists is also quite confusing...) > > > > I don't believe this is the case. > I suspect this is a members-only (or members-by-default) list. > I am on one or more concom-owned private lists (ApacheCon related), > but when I tried subscribing to concom@ back in June it disappeared > into the ether and my subscription was never approved by a mod. > > I suspect that many/most of the president's committers (concom, press, > TAC, fundraising, branding, etc) are members only, or at least members > only by default. My experience with press@ seems to confirm this. > > --David >
I found this: http://events.apache.org/involved/mailing-lists.html And I subscribed to [email protected] (and I believe I was mod-ed in) a few minutes ago.
