Mathias Sorry for this late comment but I am thinking instead of calling out fixing over 1900 issues many of which are the issues that were found and fixed in 4.2.0., should we instead say 160+ issues from 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 were fixed [1]. The end user does not care about the transient issues for features developed in 4.2
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12324870 Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement > > Great fixes Tracy! > > Much appreciated, > Matt > > > On 9/12/13 10:03 AM, "Tracy Phillips" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Matt, > > > >I made a few tweaks, if you don't like them, please feel free to revert > >back to the original. > > > > > >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mathias Mullins > ><[email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> Ok here's my first draft. Please edit boldly. > >> > >> Understand I intentionally tried to expand this one as I'M hoping > >>these announcements will not only say we are putting out the next > >>release but help to bring in more people, show them the width and > >>breath of the product (like support from major players like Cisco) > >>and get us some more press coverage and more adoption. > >> > >> I know we usually keep this sweet and simple, but I think we need to > >> up our message as well and show the maturity in our announcements as > well. > >> > >> > >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Release+Ann > >>oun > >>ce > >> ment > >> > >> Let me know what you think. > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> > >> On 8/30/13 8:00 PM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> >Absolutely! > >> > > >> >However, as for formal, take a look at the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 > >>announcements. > >> > They aren't press releases either. IMO 4.2.0 doesn't warrant one > >> > of > >>he > >> >*limited* press releases that the ASF has available. That doesn't > >> >mean that it won't get sent out to [email protected]. But that's > >> >different from > >>a > >> >formal press release. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mathias Mullins > >> ><[email protected] > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Should we be working on putting together the release statement for > >>4.2? > >> >> Since this is a Feature release, do we also want it in Press > >> >>Release format to go out over announce@apache? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Matt > >> >> > >> > >>
