Well 1900+ is still true but it covers all the transient issues for features developed during 4.2.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement > > That's fine. I thought 1900 was a bit excessive. > > Matt > > > > On 9/25/13 1:12 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Mathias > > > >Sorry for this late comment but I am thinking instead of calling out > >fixing over 1900 issues many of which are the issues that were found > >and fixed in 4.2.0., should we instead say 160+ issues from 4.1.0 and > >4.1.1 were fixed [1]. The end user does not care about the transient > >issues for features developed in 4.2 > > > > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12324870 > > > >Thanks > >Animesh > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:26 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement > >> > >> Great fixes Tracy! > >> > >> Much appreciated, > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> On 9/12/13 10:03 AM, "Tracy Phillips" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >Matt, > >> > > >> >I made a few tweaks, if you don't like them, please feel free to > >> >revert back to the original. > >> > > >> > > >> >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mathias Mullins > >> ><[email protected] > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Ok here's my first draft. Please edit boldly. > >> >> > >> >> Understand I intentionally tried to expand this one as I'M hoping > >> >>these announcements will not only say we are putting out the next > >> >>release but help to bring in more people, show them the width and > >> >>breath of the product (like support from major players like Cisco) > >> >>and get us some more press coverage and more adoption. > >> >> > >> >> I know we usually keep this sweet and simple, but I think we need > >> >> to up our message as well and show the maturity in our > >> >> announcements as > >> well. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Release+ > >> >>Ann > >> >>oun > >> >>ce > >> >> ment > >> >> > >> >> Let me know what you think. > >> >> Matt > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 8/30/13 8:00 PM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Absolutely! > >> >> > > >> >> >However, as for formal, take a look at the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 > >> >>announcements. > >> >> > They aren't press releases either. IMO 4.2.0 doesn't warrant > >> >> > one of > >> >>he > >> >> >*limited* press releases that the ASF has available. That > >> >> >doesn't mean that it won't get sent out to [email protected]. But > >> >> >that's different from > >> >>a > >> >> >formal press release. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mathias Mullins > >> >> ><[email protected] > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Should we be working on putting together the release statement > >> >> >> for > >> >>4.2? > >> >> >> Since this is a Feature release, do we also want it in Press > >> >> >>Release format to go out over announce@apache? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks, > >> >> >> Matt > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >
