That's fine. I thought 1900 was a bit excessive. Matt
On 9/25/13 1:12 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <[email protected]> wrote: >Mathias > >Sorry for this late comment but I am thinking instead of calling out >fixing over 1900 issues many of which are the issues that were found and >fixed in 4.2.0., should we instead say 160+ issues from 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 >were fixed [1]. The end user does not care about the transient issues for >features developed in 4.2 > > >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12324870 > >Thanks >Animesh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:26 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement >> >> Great fixes Tracy! >> >> Much appreciated, >> Matt >> >> >> On 9/12/13 10:03 AM, "Tracy Phillips" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Matt, >> > >> >I made a few tweaks, if you don't like them, please feel free to revert >> >back to the original. >> > >> > >> >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mathias Mullins >> ><[email protected] >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Ok here's my first draft. Please edit boldly. >> >> >> >> Understand I intentionally tried to expand this one as I'M hoping >> >>these announcements will not only say we are putting out the next >> >>release but help to bring in more people, show them the width and >> >>breath of the product (like support from major players like Cisco) >> >>and get us some more press coverage and more adoption. >> >> >> >> I know we usually keep this sweet and simple, but I think we need to >> >> up our message as well and show the maturity in our announcements as >> well. >> >> >> >> >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Release+Ann >> >>oun >> >>ce >> >> ment >> >> >> >> Let me know what you think. >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 8/30/13 8:00 PM, "Chip Childers" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Absolutely! >> >> > >> >> >However, as for formal, take a look at the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0 >> >>announcements. >> >> > They aren't press releases either. IMO 4.2.0 doesn't warrant one >> >> > of >> >>he >> >> >*limited* press releases that the ASF has available. That doesn't >> >> >mean that it won't get sent out to [email protected]. But that's >> >> >different from >> >>a >> >> >formal press release. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mathias Mullins >> >> ><[email protected] >> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Should we be working on putting together the release statement for >> >>4.2? >> >> >> Since this is a Feature release, do we also want it in Press >> >> >>Release format to go out over announce@apache? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
