On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > - Whatever happened to geoCouch?
It's fine and AFAIK, @vmx is working on make it compatible with 2.0. Cloudant didn't declare that feature they want to contribute. AFAIK, again. > - What's the general direction of the CouchDB ecosystem. Are we seeing > Cloudant diverge from Couch, with IBM-supported features not making their > way back into the open source version of Couch? We'll the other so far: Cloudant goes to be CouchDB 2.0 + extra features, which they cannot open source now (like chained map/reduce), or which we cannot include by default (like FTS because of Java). The general direction in 2.0 era is to make CouchDB scale and extend right, and find a balance between needs of regular and enterprise users on that domain. -- ,,,^..^,,,
