On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Andy Brown <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sat Oct 16 2010 17:42:32 GMT-0700 (PDT) Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andy Brown <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >>> It is a total shame that they are doing this. What next are they going >>> to >>> >>> request all that are connected to the LibreOffice community that to stop >>> being part of the OOo community? Those that are working on the >>> Documentation project can not be connected to the LibO documentation >>> project? What about the Distribution Project members? Can't offer both? >>> What about the user support from the community members, not be allowed >>> on >>> mailing list for both projects. >>> >>> >> To a degree I think is the wrong issue, the who cares who lead what. The >> big >> issue is if the community is breaking apart. Are there people willing to >> go >> to TDF, and is there people that will remain in OOo no matter what. That >> is >> the big concern in my opinion. It seems more than title fighting, we >> should >> be more concern of what will be the bottom line. >> > Well being on both lists is not the issue, but to having duplicate communication streams makes the rupture. Now you want to have two sides of a community that probably wont work as one even if to a degree are the same people. There is the third option of exactly not having roles on either of them, yet, provide support for both, at the end nobody would want to deal with an Oracle representative. Right now an even bigger call is to prohibit people (not just leads) working at TDF to speak about OOo which seems even more crazy and nearly impossible. Let see how that goes. > > What about those, myself included, that want to work on both. As a member > of the Documentation, Distribution and Marketing projects I feel that I can > still provide help. The two communities are not mutually exclusive. Work > on documentation will benefit all users. I can mail one version just as > well as the other, based on what is requested. If trying to convince > someone that Open Source and Open Format is the way to go then all still > benefit. Yes but the open format has their own set of communities. Again, more pulverization. > > > Is TDF wish to leave OOo behind? Seems so, after all, the community made >> OOo >> big (staroffice disappeared from many people's mind). However as for much >> of >> the TDF community now growing, we have been very slow developing the >> infrastructure to receive all of the rest of the projects. So for example, >> where will the documentation project go, or the distribution project go? >> Still uncertain about those issues, I guess they will go with time. Then >> is >> 3.3 on OOo which some people will remain until the launch of that version. >> > > I have some concerns about the prior planning on the whole thing but will > wait and see. The documentation project's main site is on an Oracle server, > I believe, but the actual work is done on an non-Oracle server so will not > be effected. The distribution project I am not sure of. The mailing list > is on Oracle server but the mirrors are all over, not sure who runs the > mirror brain. There is a choice which involved the OOoAuthors.org to get their own list, and migrate everyone to it. This is a choice we are also discussing for other projects. Having authorship of the servers will surely help us secure the community. > > > Andy > > -- > E-mail to [email protected]<marketing%[email protected]>for > instructions on how to unsubscribe > List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ > All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
