Hi *, I disagree, I feel same people can't be ruling OOo and TDF. And I see a clear Conflict of Interest for people in the Community Council.
Both communities will be able to collaborate in tons of things, but the project leaders can't share responsabilities in both projects. If so, why to have two Communities? The shame is that a such simple thing has been to be asked by the OOo Council members to some people. You can't fork a open source project and keep leading the original one! It's atonishing just trying to do it. Best Greetings, Ra Heinz W. Simoneit wrote: > Hi *, > > Florian Effenberger schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Andy Brown wrote on 2010-10-16 20.24: >>> It is a total shame that they are doing this. What next are they going >>> to request all that are connected to the LibreOffice community that to >>> stop being part of the OOo community? Those that are working on the >>> Documentation project can not be connected to the LibO documentation >>> project? What about the Distribution Project members? Can't offer >>> both? What about the user support from the community members, not be >>> allowed on mailing list for both projects. >> I totally agree. It's a shame to see that only one specific group out >> of the community forces us to make a decision, while the others either >> don't care/see any problem, or support our step. That's sad to hear, >> and that has nothing to do with a community, if one group can force >> the other... >> >> Florian > > +1 > > Heinz > -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
