It does seem a much fairer review and much more competently done than most of the others i have read so far. The nice slideshow is an interesting gimmick and was a nice touch.
I feel that it is slightly biased in favour of LibreOffice and compares against previous versions of OpenOffice rather than comparing against MS Office but i think that was a good move as it kept things clearer. Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: Marc Paré <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, 27 January, 2011 5:53:36 Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: eWeek.com article Le 2011-01-26 20:45, Lyle Cochran a écrit : > Hi All, > > Here is a good factual article with a nice slide show on eWeek.com. > Thanks to Fahmida Y. Rashid<http://www.eweek.com/cp/bio/Fahmida-Y.-Rashid/> >LibreOffice-33-Suite-Advances-While-Staying-True-to-OpenOffice-Roots<http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/LibreOffice-33-Suite-Advances-While-Staying-True-to-OpenOffice-Roots-206088/> >> > > congrats > Lyle Cochran > Hi Lyle: Thanks for the link. Yes, it is a very factual review. Even thought the author does not suggest whether to use or not use LibreOffice, our LibreOffice suite does come out looking quite good. Thanks again for the link. Cheers Marc -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
