On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:04 -0400, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2011-06-29 10:43, drew a écrit : > > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:37 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> drew wrote on 2011-06-29 16.19: > >>> So - I am simply asking if the hour long conversation that took place > >>> between the three of us was recorded. > >> just checked - it looks like there indeed is a recording. Shall we > >> upload it somewhere? > > Of course - to the wiki as the recoding of the meeting, just because > > there was a technical glitch doesn't mean it, the meeting, didn't > > happen. > > > > //drew > > > > > Well, we should really define "meeting". If the room is closed to all > others, and there are only 3 members in the room, I myself would not > consider this as enough of a quorum to consider it a meeting. There were > 2 of us on IRC asking where the meeting was occurring with no answer > from the people meeting in the Talkyoo room -- we were on the IRC > channel for approximately 20 minutes. In this case I would call it more > of a "discussion" but where no decisions should be taken. We really need > to define a quorum for our meetings. We usually number around 5-6 > regular members who meet monthly and with 1-2 people who occasionally > sit on the sidelines. > > In this case, as it could not be considered a meeting due to these > circumstances,I don't think we need to make the notes or recording made > official on our marketing meeting wiki page. IMO, we really need to meet > in an open and transparent manner to consider it an official meeting. > It's OK to make note of it on the marketing mailing list to inform the > members, but not to make it look like an official marketing team > meeting, which is was not -- members were locked out. If there are > issues that were discussed and a decision is needed, then we need to > re-discuss it with all members who wish(ed) to attend contributing to > the discussion and decision.
Hi Marc, Well, there was a regularly scheduled meeting. Three people managed to make it to that meeting. As part of these meetings what is said is made public by first putting minutes to the wiki, second by placing the recoding of the call on the wiki. Regarding a quorum - that would be for taking votes. There was no vote taken on anything. In other words this is the "Open and Transparent" way to go, to make the recording available for those that could not be present. Thanks, Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
