On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Charles-H.Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that we should just put together raw data (screeshots) without >> comments. Other people will be able to connect the dots and develop >> their own opinion. >> >> SAOSA (self-appointed open source advocates à la Rob Weir) should start >> to be recognized for their peculiarities, and judged by authentic free >> software advocates for their [de]merits. > > Well... I don't want to troll and I think we have more constructive > things to do even with AOO and ASF (which I think is a reputable > foundation and has been a net plus for FOSS). > But sometimes it's also useful to call FUD what it is; and this > negative energy spread around by a few rotten apples helps no one. If > anything, it shows how immature these apples are.
I think our (TDF/LO) success can be judged on its own merits. What I don't understand is why some of the SAOSA sound like they are threatened by our success. As you say, spreading negative energy around helps no one. --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
