On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've sent Rob my proposal
>
> This is a quick look at the alteration.
> http://imagebin.org/257532
>
> - Adjusted the dot in the character i so it wouldn't collide into the f's
> when scaled down.
> - Spacing of f's kept the same, even though I wanted to join them they just
> didn't look right after wards.
> - TM less prominent.
> - Apache less prominent with a grey font colour, as per comments, people
> who liked it as a 4 said the apache stuck out too much, I'm hoping this
> would have won their 5 had I done it before.
>

Hi Samer,

You  should add your image to this wiki page:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement

Thanks!

-Rob


> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Can you send the original file to me? ( [email protected] )  I will try my
>> way of adjusting
>>
>> With Warm Regards
>>
>> V.Kadal Amutham
>> 919444360480
>> 914422396480
>>
>>
>> On 13 May 2013 09:18, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > sorry everyone i've been crawling and scraping to get some personal work
>> > completed.
>> >
>> > I haven't read all the comments, and i haven't seen the comments for
>> other
>> > top logos.  So I will have a better idea once that is done.
>> >
>> > But for what I saw last week, this is what I will be submitting:
>> > - Single logo, the thinner font one.
>> > - Adjusting the TM to not be prominent.
>> > - Adjusting the character spacing slightly better. I liked the spacing in
>> > roboto most but I think I'm drawn to technical looking fonts.
>> >
>> > I will try to have this done by 1pm EST time monday (over my lunch hour).
>> >  On May 11, 2013 10:48 AM, "Rob Weir" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > Rob,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for your efforts here.
>> > > >
>> > > > On May 11, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I've been going through the thousands of comments received in the
>> > > >> survey, trying to make sense of them.  Here are two things I thought
>> > > >> were interesting and worth discussing:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 1) The number "4" appears to be unlucky in China, Japan and Korea.
>> > > >> Sometimes product their will even skip over version 4 of a product
>> and
>> > > >> go directly to 5.   (In other cultures 13 is unlucky, and hotels
>> will
>> > > >> not have a 13th floor).
>> > > >>
>> > > >> So the feedback was that we might not want to have a "4" be too
>> > > >> prominent or central in the logo.
>> > > >
>> > > > I think that this is a strong point. Why tie the logotype to the
>> > version?
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2) Some users suggested that a prominent "TM" trademark symbol was
>> > > >> seen as conflicting with the openness theme.
>> > > >
>> > > > A TM is important for protecting the brand and it is something that
>> the
>> > > ASF has requested from all projects. It does not have to be prominent,
>> > but
>> > > ought to be present.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Exactly.  We need it there, but it doesn't need to be part of the
>> > > design.  If we wanted we could do it like Starbucks does on their
>> > > logo.
>> > >
>> > > No guarantees this page is the same in all countries, but look at
>> > > upper left here:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.starbucks.com/
>> > >
>> > > With their log the TM is not part of the design but placed in the
>> border.
>> > >
>> > > -Rob
>> > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dave
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -Rob
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to