done
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've sent Rob my proposal > > > > This is a quick look at the alteration. > > http://imagebin.org/257532 > > > > - Adjusted the dot in the character i so it wouldn't collide into the f's > > when scaled down. > > - Spacing of f's kept the same, even though I wanted to join them they > just > > didn't look right after wards. > > - TM less prominent. > > - Apache less prominent with a grey font colour, as per comments, people > > who liked it as a 4 said the apache stuck out too much, I'm hoping this > > would have won their 5 had I done it before. > > > > Hi Samer, > > You should add your image to this wiki page: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement > > Thanks! > > -Rob > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Kadal Amutham <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Can you send the original file to me? ( [email protected] ) I will try > my > >> way of adjusting > >> > >> With Warm Regards > >> > >> V.Kadal Amutham > >> 919444360480 > >> 914422396480 > >> > >> > >> On 13 May 2013 09:18, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > sorry everyone i've been crawling and scraping to get some personal > work > >> > completed. > >> > > >> > I haven't read all the comments, and i haven't seen the comments for > >> other > >> > top logos. So I will have a better idea once that is done. > >> > > >> > But for what I saw last week, this is what I will be submitting: > >> > - Single logo, the thinner font one. > >> > - Adjusting the TM to not be prominent. > >> > - Adjusting the character spacing slightly better. I liked the > spacing in > >> > roboto most but I think I'm drawn to technical looking fonts. > >> > > >> > I will try to have this done by 1pm EST time monday (over my lunch > hour). > >> > On May 11, 2013 10:48 AM, "Rob Weir" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > Rob, > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks for your efforts here. > >> > > > > >> > > > On May 11, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> I've been going through the thousands of comments received in the > >> > > >> survey, trying to make sense of them. Here are two things I > thought > >> > > >> were interesting and worth discussing: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 1) The number "4" appears to be unlucky in China, Japan and > Korea. > >> > > >> Sometimes product their will even skip over version 4 of a > product > >> and > >> > > >> go directly to 5. (In other cultures 13 is unlucky, and hotels > >> will > >> > > >> not have a 13th floor). > >> > > >> > >> > > >> So the feedback was that we might not want to have a "4" be too > >> > > >> prominent or central in the logo. > >> > > > > >> > > > I think that this is a strong point. Why tie the logotype to the > >> > version? > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 2) Some users suggested that a prominent "TM" trademark symbol > was > >> > > >> seen as conflicting with the openness theme. > >> > > > > >> > > > A TM is important for protecting the brand and it is something > that > >> the > >> > > ASF has requested from all projects. It does not have to be > prominent, > >> > but > >> > > ought to be present. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Exactly. We need it there, but it doesn't need to be part of the > >> > > design. If we wanted we could do it like Starbucks does on their > >> > > logo. > >> > > > >> > > No guarantees this page is the same in all countries, but look at > >> > > upper left here: > >> > > > >> > > http://www.starbucks.com/ > >> > > > >> > > With their log the TM is not part of the design but placed in the > >> border. > >> > > > >> > > -Rob > >> > > > >> > > > Regards, > >> > > > Dave > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Regards, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> -Rob > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
