On quinta-feira, 19 de abril de 2012 14.39.52, Quim Gil wrote: > Maybe we don't want an unconference after all? ;) > > Something we did in a couple of Maemo Summits was to have an open wiki > where people could schedule their own sessions as long as they were > filling empty slots or negotiating swaps with other slots. A few people > "content committee" could move talks to better spots, and there was some > spots left empty on purpose for last minute sessions. > > No call for papers, but no unconference either. I personally liked it > but FULL DISCLOSURE I came up with that proposal, and it received some > criticism as well. No system is perfect.
Pre-scheduling a few sessions is good. But I really would like to leave at
least 40% of the slots free, for on-site scheduling. We aren't sure who's
coming or what subjects will turn up during discussion.
As a consequence, there's also a temporal component: more sessions pre-
scheduled for the beginning of the event, fewer towards the end.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
